Hereditary Politicians Still Dominant in Japan

Hereditary politicians remain a powerful force in Japan’s political scene. More than 30% of elected representatives from all parties are second, third, or fourth-generation Diet members.

Hereditary politics has long been a feature of Japanese democracy. Still, some critics have suggested it’s becoming more of a structural issue. This article examines why it is so prevalent and its challenges to the political process.

Hereditary politicians remain the dominant force in Japan, with 45 percent of its Diet members – including a large majority of Prime Ministers – being nisei. These families rely on the “three musts”: support groups, name recognition, and pornos campaign finances to gain power; unfortunately for their offspring, these resources often disappear as well.

However, this practice is increasingly under criticism from voters and political scientists who say it creates an inbred version of democracy that doesn’t adequately meet the needs of most Japanese citizens. Additionally, this practice has contributed to leadership paralysis within Japan, making it harder for politicians to effectively address crises like Japan’s financial crisis or prolonged economic decline.

A mirage

Nisheek is also highly likely to succeed in elections; in 2018, they accounted for more than half of the LDP’s Diet seats. But, again, this is because Japan’s political system, while democratic, does not always reflect it accurately.

Instead, it is a functional bureaucracy with all the statesmanship, brown-nosing, inter-factional stonewalling, media silencing, corruption, and sycophantism that such an arrangement requires. Unfortunately, hereditary politics remains entrenched and has become a significant barrier to developing new ideas in Japan’s political arena.

Hereditary politics are not inherently wrong, but it’s essential to note that they can restrict the inflow of new blood into Japan’s political system – potentially harming democratization. Furthermore, many individuals with potential for political office avoid running because they feel their family obligations and jobs make running for office too demanding.


Koenkai is a political support group centered on individual politicians that are one of the most effective vote mobilization methods in Japanese politics. Research has indicated that those associated with Koenkai tend to have a 10% higher voter turnout than non-members.

Koenkai networks remain influential in Japanese politics despite recent electoral reforms. Money plays an integral role in garnering votes and getting seats in parliament, so their networks provide invaluable resources for many politicians.

Most of Japan’s population comprises nisei (second-generation Diet members). As a result, they possess access to family finances and business connections that are invaluable for gaining power in both parliaments and as prime ministers.

Koenkai has become an essential element of the political process and has helped strengthen the LDP’s power. Furthermore, they serve as a critical instrument in electoral strategy as they act as a vote-mobilizing device for individual politicians.

Koenkai may provide funding for candidates’ campaign efforts.

They typically form in districts they represent and use local businesses or individuals as sources of capital.

The LDP has utilized this form of campaigning since the 1980s. It is widely believed that it still exerts considerable political power today. This is partly due to their continued control of the legislature – something impossible before 1994 when SNTV/MMD animeidhentai system changes were instituted.

Until recently, this system was widely seen as an effective means of cultivating a clientelistic political atmosphere, encouraging candidates to craft personal campaign strategies to win votes – particularly in multimember districts where candidates could compete against one another.

As a result, candidate campaigns became heavily dominated by kinken-seiji (money power politics), which had been nurtured during the pre-reform era. This system also ensured that candidate campaigns focused on garnering personal votes rather than substantive policy debates.

In 1994, however, the SNTV/MMD system was replaced by the mixed member majoritarian (MMM) system. While this marked a significant reduction in relevance during campaigns and eliminated single-member districts altogether, it didn’t eradicate clientelism. Indeed, koenkai networks were influential in helping propel the Liberal Democratic Party back to power in 2009 and are expected to remain so going forward.


Japan has a longstanding tradition of hereditary politics. One notable example is the Koizumi family, an influential political force since the late 1930s. Many members of this clan have served as Prime Ministers, including Nobusuke Kishi and Shinzo Abe.

Hereditary politicians in Japan remain dominant despite only sometimes being successful candidates due to three primary resources: Jiban (local support groups), Kanban (name recognition), and Kaban (financial support from their koenkai). A study by Nikkei Asia revealed that hereditary candidates’ electoral success rate is 80 percent greater than non-hereditary ones.

The LDP has maintained its majority in both Houses of Representatives and local assemblies, even during trying times, such as after the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011. Moreover, although its support in rural areas was reduced due to economic hardship, its hold on urban districts remains strong – it holds a solid majority in Tokyo metropolitan area local assemblies with help from the urban-based CGP coalition.

Koenkai has the potential to unite voters with their elected representatives. Yet, many supporters would instead rely on them. Many view the koenkai as a personal political tool that serves only one politician and can quickly be passed along in the family.


To overcome these barriers, nisei (native-born Japanese) must become responsive to their koenkai and mobilize its resources and voters for them.

Hereditary politicians must often prioritize creating an image and programs that appeal to local voters, particularly in urban districts where voters are not bound by koenkai.

Koenkai must ensure their policies are consistent with those of their chosen candidates, which could prove challenging as koenkai may offer financial incentives to promote them and attract additional supporters.

Hereditary politicians must strive to connect emotionally with their electorate by tailoring programs and policies according to people’s needs. This is especially critical if they plan to lead the country through difficult times.

Hope after COVID Vaccine – New strand is worrisome

An Associated Press analysis of publicly available government data showed in May that trailblazing infections among vaccinated people accounted for fewer than 1,200 of the more than 107,000 hospitalizations by COVID-19 nationwide. But the Covid 19 deaths in the US among people who have not been vaccinated are harrowing proof of how effective the vaccine is. The indication for daily deaths is 300, compared with zero for those with the vaccine.

More than 90% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were not vaccinated in the St. Louis area, said Dr Alex Garza, a hospital administrator who led the Metropolitan Area Working Group on the outbreak. In Seattle, the King County Department of Health recorded xxx three deaths among vaccinated people in the past 60 days. About 150 of the more than 18,000 Covid 19 deaths since May have been among fully vaccinated people.

Dr Anthony Fauci, America’s leading infectious disease expert and COVID-19, said that 99.2% of recent COVID-19 deaths in the United States involve unvaccinated people. It’s a tragic situation that needs to be fixed, he said Sunday. But, unfortunately, there are still people in the world who don’t have a vaccine.

All thanks the vaccine

On Saturday, Russia reported 697 more virus deaths – the fifth straight day, the death count had reached a daily record. The National Coronavirus Task Force said 663 patients had died the previous day, a record high.

America’s leading infectious disease expert says that 99.2% of recent COVID-19 deaths in the United States involve nonvaccinated people. The US recorded 605,000 deaths during the pandemic, the highest national toll in the world. More than 60,500 deaths in America, more than 1.837 million confirmed coronavirus cases, and more than 3.97 million deaths worldwide.

Centres for Disease Control and Prevention investigate the case of a 13-year-old boy from Saginaw County. The child died in his sleep three days after administering his second dose of the COVID-19 vaccination in mid-June. The county health department confirms the investigation and tells the Free Porno Press that the medical examiner’s office will conduct an autopsy and report the death to the state health department and the CDC.

As part of a national effort to protect species through experimental vaccines. The San Francisco Bay Area Zoo vaccinated its large cats, bears and ferrets against coronavirus. A zoo in the San Francisco Bay Area is vaccinating its big cats, bears and ferrets against the coronavirus. It is part of a national effort to protect animal species by developing and donating an experimental vaccine developed and presented by a New Jersey company.

Pets are being vaccinated now

Alex Herman, vice president for veterinary services at the Oakland Zoo, said that none of the animals had received the vaccination so far, but the zoo wants to be proactive.

The doses were donated and developed by Zoetis, a veterinary drug company based in New Jersey. Service members, first responders and more than 1,000 guests will attend an event at the White House on Sunday to mark the nation’s birthday.

Covid: Will your pet need a coronavirus vaccine? - BBC News

Denmark and the UK, both leaders in the genomic surveillance world, are seeing a steady increase in cases from the delta variant, but significantly less than most other European countries. As Robert Koch Institute President Lothar Wieler announced on Tuesday. Delta variants achieved a relative weight of 3.6 per cent in the week between 14 and 20 June based on national genome sequencing, more than 15 per cent more than the previous week. So it is only a matter of time before the Delta Plus variant takes hold in these countries. They are hoping that its expansion will slow immunization, surveillance and improved contact tracking.

Scientists believe the delta variant is the most aggressive and contagious strain of the COVID-19 virus ever seen. In addition, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it has been shown to increase transmission, resulting in lower protection against the current Covid-19 viruses and vaccines.

New delta variant is worrying

A worldwide increase in COVID-19 cases has been linked to the transmissible delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus. The delta variant contributed to the rise in cases in India, Nepal, Britain, Portugal and Australia, Ewen Callaway reports in Nature News. “A lot of the low oxygen deaths are caused by the Delta variant. We see delta variants in more than 90 countries around the world”.

Qué es la variante Delta Plus? ¿Es lo mismo que Delta Variant? - AS USA

The rate of cases has doubled in the last two weeks in the United States. The highly transmitted delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus accounts for about 20 per cent of the coronaviruses analyzed. Studies have shown that vaccines effectively prevent COVID-19 symptoms when the delta variant is present. Still, since vaccines are not widely available in communities where humans are not vaccinated, the availability of this variant is spreading out.

The highly transmissible delta variant has spread rapidly in more than 70 countries. The dominant variant in India, Great Britain and Singapore. In Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming, it’s 18 per cent, and statewide it’s six per cent.

Spreading rapidly

A highly contagious variant of coronavirus known as the delta is spreading rapidly in the United States and worldwide. It leads to an increase in cases in some countries and causing several nations to introduce new bans. Last week, Dr Anthony Fauci, the leading infectious disease expert and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, called the Delta virus “the biggest threat” to the elimination of COVID-19 in a news conference in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it accounts for approximately 25 per cent of all new Covid 19 cases in the country. It is on course to become the dominant version of the Coronavirus in America circulating.

Jean-Francois Delfraissy, the scientific adviser of the French government, warned that France could see a fourth wave of the virus due to the increase in cases due to the Delta variant of the virus. About half of Australia’s population – more than 12 million people – are under house arrest. In addition, seven cities have imposed restrictions to combat the delta virus outbreak.

The delta coronavirus variant is becoming more common in California. As new data underscore the dangers of the virus for people who are not vaccinated against COVID-19. According to the California Department of Health data, the delta variant accounted for 14.5% of California coronavirus cases analyzed in June. Compared with 4.7% in May when it was first identified as a variant in the state. This week, it was estimated that the Delta variant of coronavirus is responsible for 9 to 10 per cent of new cases in France.

COVID Delta variant and vaccines: What are the symptoms, vaccine and  everything about the new strain | Marca

Highly infectious

Vaccination rates are not keeping pace with the spread. Experts say they could lead to a new wave of COVID in parts of the country where a significant proportion of the population is unvaccinated.

Previous studies suggest that the Delta variant is between 40 and 60 per cent more transmissible than the alpha variant – identified in the UK, about 50 per cent transmitted – and the original strain detected in Wuhan, China.

More than 2.9 million people in the UK have received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Figures from Public Health England show that the two-dose vaccine is 80.8 per cent effective against symptomatic diseases caused by the delta variant. Which is responsible for more than 90 per cent of new coronavirus cases in the UK. In contrast, a single dose of the vaccine is more effective and provides 33.2 per cent protection.

Covid cases and the number of hospitalizations and deaths have plummeted thanks to months of lockouts and one of the world’s fastest vaccination programs. Although vaccinated people have a lower risk of severe Cipki COVID-19, the rise of coronavirus cases has affected their health in other ways. For example, experts say the wave of pandemic coronaviruses has disrupted routine early detection and outpatient care.

A worldwide worry

Two months later, the delta variant of SARS CoV 2 triggered a third wave of uncertainty in Britain. Forcing the government to delay the company’s full reopening initially scheduled for June 21.

People queued at a vaccination centre in Sydney on June 24, 2021. After residents were banned from leaving the city to prevent a highly contagious delta variant of COVID-19 from spreading to other regions. A highly infectious variant of the SARS-CoV-19 virus has hit the headlines after it was discovered in India. It has triggered an extreme increase in Covid-19 cases and spread around the world. In addition, a mutation of the virus called Delta-Plus has emerged that is beginning to worry experts around the world.

Home-schooling: the best decision you’ll ever make

Albeit many might be amazed at the development of self-teaching during the previous few decades, the genuine shock is presumably how that development occurred and that it proceeds. Home-school backers and professionals have prevailing regardless of an absence of financing, selecting endeavours, exposure, and award cash from altruistic wealthy people.

In the interim they’ve confronted resistance from the National Education Association (NEA), obstructions forced by particular school regions and different state porn limitations, guidelines, and prerequisites. There is too little if any expert improvement for parent-teachers furthermore, essentially no future profession way (or annuities) for those guardians. Fundamentally, there is an absence of institutional information with which to keep the self-teaching development going ahead.

Different options, in contrast to conventional government-funded school, have experienced a portion of these equivalent hindrances. Yet, self-teaching has endured and thrived over the past 50 years in the face of every one of these difficulties.

There is no showcasing to captivate guardians to self-teach in contrast to private, parochial, and even sanction schools. The self-teaching lifestyle frequently starts employing word of mouth. As our forefathers would have done it: one customer at a time. Interpersonal interaction, self-teaching web journals, and the abundance of how-to books composed by self-taught students have helped them understand the real factors of a self-teach way of life.

One size might not fit all

This article will endeavour to clarify a few of these issues by evaluating a concise history of self-teaching, the difficulties related to characterizing and checking self-taught students, the transcendent explanations behind self-teaching. The primary job parental decision plays in the choice to self-teach.
There is no everyday self-taught student or self-teaching family.

The “one size fits all” model that state-funded schools integrate into the core of their teaching method has been utter horror for self-taught students. As they are quick to dismiss any kind of individualized learning plans personalized for the students’ needs. Their strategy is certifiably not an adaptable bundle in the ordinary sense. Still, instead, an expansion of attractive programs redid to address the issues of the individual understudy.

While self-teaching perspectives and preferences are hard to recreate in the general framework considering, they are costly. Numerous creative parts of shesfreaky could be reproduced in a customary school climate. Self-teaching is a practical option for the numerous understudies; also, their families who wish to quit conventional public schools despite a family’s reasoning for self-teaching.

There’s a familiar axiom that is reasonable to self-teaching: “Not all that tallies can be checked, and not all that can be tallied checks.”
Scarcely any self-teaching conversation is complete without hearing the inquiry, “How numerous self-taught students are there?” In 1980, instructive scholar and self-teaching advocate John Holt replied by answering “No one knows, yet I’d surmise someplace near 10,000 families.”

Presently, about 35 years after the fact, the guardians of more than 2,000,000 students in the United States accept schooling is critical to be left to the teachers. Clinging to Holt’s way of thinking (also, the title of his fundamental 1981 book): Teach Your Own.

Holt’s method

Holt’s unpleasant gauge of 10,000 held influence in the early 1980s. At that point, colossal development kicked in. By the 1990s state schooling organizations (SEAs) perceived a consistent expansion in self-taught students’ quantity. They started gathering information utilizing gauges extrapolated from neighbourhood locale document neighbourhood. Since there was no consistency in nearby documenting prerequisites or observing self-taught students, the self-taughtmation was inconsistent.

By the mid-90s, just three states had recording rates of free porn that could be viewed as close to 100% accurate. Self-teaching is currently lawful in each of the 50 states and isn’t as it was becoming however prospering. Right now, the essential source utilized to figure the quantity of self-taught students in the U. S. is the Public Center for Education Statistics (NCES), part of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the autonomous, non-sectarian arm of the U.S. Branch of Education answerable for instructive data, examination, and measurements.

Self-teaching measurements were initially consolidated into
NCES announcing in 1999 utilizing information from the parent portion of the National Household Education Survey Program. That year NCES assessed that there were 850,000 self-taught students, about 1.7 per cent of the U.S. understudy populace between the ages of 5 and 17. By 2003, that number had expanded to 1.1 million self-taught students or 2.2 percent, everything being equal. By 2007 it was1.5 million or right around 3 percent of all understudies across the country.

Increasing popularity

The most recent figures distributed by the NCES (2012) assessed 1.8 million, 3.4 percent of all K-12 understudies, were being home-instructed in the U.S. This is more than two-fold the number that was being self-taught when the NCES first started gathering information in 1999. Mirroring a yearly increment of 7 percent for the vast majority of the primary decade. During that same time, state-funded school enlistment was developing at not exactly 1 percent for each year.

While the noteworthy self-taught student yearly development pace of 7 percent was not maintainable, the latest gauge of 3 percent every year is still impressive. Even this lower development factor demonstrates that self-teaching handily outperformed the two million imprint in 2016.

Moreover, even a slight expansion in the 1.8 million self-taught students in 2012 implies that those fabguys being self-taught surpassed the 2016 parochial school enrollment for the first time. With a proceeding with a decrease in private school enrollment foreseen at any rate through 2026, self-teaching has gotten the nation’s quickest developing other option instructive choice.

Concerning Massachusetts, the Department of Elementary and Auxiliary Education (DESE) has distributed school and locale profiles on their site covering more than 30 years of information. It joined self-teaching numbers since 2010 DESE expresses that there are nearly 7,500 self-taught students in the state.

A developing method

However, these checks are dependent upon the equivalent fancies as the public information gauges as they are self-detailed by school regions. Ann Zeise, who has been composing and exploring self-teaching issues for a very long, meters that there are finished 28,000 self-taught students in the Commonwealth. Likewise, a Boston Magazine article basically questions the self-teaching mean the city of Boston is under-announced by DESE by more than half.

Amusingly, as the topic of the number of self-taught students was on the skirt of being settled, the meaning of what comprises a “self-taught student” started to unwind.

Through the last part of the twentieth century, home-schooling’s meaning appeared clear: an understudy not instructed by the general population educational system but someone whose family directs their learning at home.

Homeschooling – Defining Some Terms

Here used simply as the most common or familiar term for the type of childrearing in which parents refrain from sending their child(ren) away for an institutionalized ‘education.’

In this sense the term implies a negative: what these parents do not do.

Some individuals object to the positive implications of the term “homeschooling” since they are in no way wanting or trying to imitate an institutional school in their homes. Their preferred terms include “unschooling,” “home education,” “home-based education,” and “family-based education” among others.

The author of the HomeSchooling TEXAS website tends to agree with that objection and looks forward to a day when what we do needs no label of explanation and will be valued and recognized as simply living our own lives in the way that we choose. For now…

… there are three very simple reasons for the domain name “HomeSchooling TEXAS”:
1) “homeschooling” = “non-institutionalized education” (I use the term to imply the negative.)
2) In spite of all the different names used to describe non-institutionalized education for children,
people seeking information type the word “homeschooling” into web search engines way more
often than any other term. (I wanted people to find this website!)
3) It’s aimed at those who are practicing non-institutionalized education in… Texas. 🙂


While it is a geographical area defined by the human invention of lines drawn on a map, it’s much more than that. If you’re a Texian, you already understand. If you don’t understand, you may be in the wrong place.


A word (in Spanish, Tejano) describing the people or culture of the Texas section of the state of Coahuila y Tejas, Republic of Mexico, and the subsequent Republic of Texas.


A single human being. Not a group, organization, or any type of collective but one single person.


“Liberty describes a social system in which free men and women live and cooperate with one another. Because their minds are free of conflict, their relationships with others tend to be peaceful and respective of one another’s autonomy.” *


In the realm of the mind and concerning thoughts, ideas, and beliefs.


“Freedom is a state of mind that is not in conflict or contradiction, a mind that has integrity (i.e., is integrated into a consistent whole).” *

* I have yet to find a better definition and distinction of the concepts “freedom” and “liberty” than what is quoted here. Credit goes to Butler Shaffer, a professor at Southwestern University School of Law (and one of my favorite thinkers and writers on these topics!) and his essay: “Why Are We Afraid To Be Free?.”

The most destructive propaganda is being spread

Judge Murray, who wrote the Leeper decision, made no such spurious claim. He merely agreed that home education had always been considered private education in Texas.

The basis for our duty & responsibility in rearing our own children lies in the fact that… WE ARE THEIR PARENTS.

With Leeper, homeschoolers initiated a court case asking for A STATE DEFINITION OF HOMESCHOOLING as private schooling. While this was a very bad idea on their part, we can be glad that Judge Murray was inclined to uphold Texas’ constitutional law.

Please take a moment to read this oft-quoted excerpt from the Leeper decision where Judge Murray describes a private or parochial school within the meaning of the exemption section of the Texas Education Code. We have already seen that only those educational institutions SUPPORTED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY STATE TAX FUNDS fall within the regulatory power of the Texas Education Code.

Is your home “supported in whole or in part by state tax funds”? Are you one of those schools he was describing? Have you been tricked into thinking that there would be some kind of “security” in calling your home a “private school” as mentioned in Leeper? Might you want to research this for yourself and rethink that position?

Please consider this: in order for the exemption section of a code to apply to you, you must be one of those to whom the code applies in the first place. The only other way to find yourself down in that exemption section is for you to voluntarily bind yourself by it.

RELATED READING: Are You the Parent or a State Babysitter? (Bev Jones, April 2001)



In the Leeper appeal, the court upheld the ruling that the state pay $360,000 IN ATTORNEY FEES FOR THE PLAINTIFFS.

The Leeper case, which mainly accomplished a further muddying of the waters for most folks, cost us dearly.

I don’t particularly appreciate a “carefully selected” group of statist homeschoolers deciding to make us foot the bill for an unnecessary lawsuit. Even less do I appreciate the arrogance of this group of politician, curriculum vendor, and umbrella school plaintiffs in presuming to speak for all home educators past, present, and future by filing this as a class-action lawsuit.

But these things can likely be written off to (at least some degree of) ignorance on the part of those just mentioned.

The attorneys, who should (and do) know better and go around promoting and facilitating lawsuits concerning things the state has no constitutionally enumerated power over in the first place, are reprehensible. And dangerous. And way too expensive!